No subject

Unknown Unknown
Tue Mar 30 13:04:06 PDT 2010


190348.GA87539 at venus.xenno.com> <C5616CEE-2816-4E66-846D-40029E634186 at gmail.com>
From: "Alex Hornung" <ahornung at gmail.com>
Subject: RE: wlan_ratectl (was Re: firmware discussion)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:01:53 +0100
BestServHost: crater.dragonflybsd.org
List-Post: <mailto:kernel at crater.dragonflybsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:kernel-request at crater.dragonflybsd.org?body=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kernel-request at crater.dragonflybsd.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-Help: <mailto:kernel-request at crater.dragonflybsd.org?body=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:owner-kernel at crater.dragonflybsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <C5616CEE-2816-4E66-846D-40029E634186 at gmail.com>
Sender: kernel-errors at crater.dragonflybsd.org
Errors-To: kernel-errors at crater.dragonflybsd.org
Lines: 10
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.240.41.25
X-Trace: 1269979604 crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org 55377 216.240.41.25
Xref: crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org dragonfly.kernel:14202

: This won't get into FreeBSD as is. The fact is that we have a small
: amount of code to handle with the rate control framework, but the rate
: control framework isn't written yet.

So why exactly is our wlan ratectl not acceptable for FreeBSD? What is so
bad about it?

Cheers,
Alex Hornung






More information about the Kernel mailing list