NetBSD's veriexec port
Francois Tigeot
ftigeot at wolfpond.org
Tue Oct 13 13:39:04 PDT 2009
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:13:54PM +0300, Stathis Kamperis wrote:
> 2009/10/13 Matthew Dillon <dillon at apollo.backplane.com>:
> > I'm only luke-warm on the concept. I would much rather see improvements
> > in the virtual kernel technology w/ regards to ease of use, features,
> > and performance.
>
> I thought that the vkernel technology was mostly for development. Has
> this changed or I got it wrong from the beginning ?
>
> Do we aim at a "real" virtualisation solution to be used for
> production purposes ?
Well, I didn't know it wasn't ready for production -- it is used everyday by my
company to run a java-based pdf generation tool.
So far so good: there is no critical speed penalty and the legacy binaries are
nicely isolated from the main system by the VM environment.
Your mileage may vary.
--
Francois Tigeot
More information about the Kernel
mailing list