devfs

[Simon 'corecode' Schubert]

Eric Masson wrote:
"Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode at fs.ei.tum.de> writes:

Hello,

No, nobody does.  Also, it is not clear whether a port would be good or
whether rewriting it from scratch would be better.
Iirc, Matt eplained a long time ago that he would prefer a Linux udev
like scheme (Events generated by kernel & /dev housekeeping via a
userland daemon).
Yah, that might but not current anymore :)

What I'd like to see is a twofold scheme:  A virtual devfs, plus 
udev-alike functionality:

- The devfs will show all existing devices with their standard names, and 
only those.
- have userland set permissions and create aliases (links?)

cheers
  simon
--
  <3 the future  +++  RENT this banner advert  +++   ASCII Ribbon   /"\
  rock the past  +++  space for low €€€ NOW!1  +++     Campaign     \ /
Party Enjoy Relax   |   http://dragonflybsd.org      Against  HTML   \
Dude 2c 2 the max   !   http://golden-apple.biz       Mail + News   / \