[Tux3] Comparison to Hammer fs design

Pedro F. Giffuni pfgshield-freebsd at yahoo.com
Sat Jul 26 17:53:26 PDT 2008

Maslan wrote:
Why LVM why not follow the ZFS path ?

In FreeBSD's case I think the ZFS approach fits very well with GEOM.

Neither NetBSD or DragonFly have an operational ZFS (yet), so instead of 
growing their own fs-specific implementation from the ground up it looks 
reasonable to leverage the LVM effort.

Just my $0.02, of course.


More information about the Kernel mailing list