S_ISBLK still useful?

Matthew Dillon dillon at apollo.backplane.com
Mon Jul 14 15:17:45 PDT 2008

:we stopped having dedicated block devices long ago.  Now some programs 
:still check for S_ISBLK.  I wonder, should we make S_ISBLK behave like 
:   simon

    No, I'd say we should just leave it alone for now.  If we 
    give them the same ID any third party program switch()ing on it
    will have compile errors.

					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon at backplane.com>

More information about the Kernel mailing list