Decision time.... should NATA become the default for this release?
Matthew Dillon
dillon at apollo.backplane.com
Mon Jun 4 13:45:32 PDT 2007
:Matt - how firm are you on calling the next release 2.0? A major version
:number increment usually has a major change with it, and the new
:filesystem would make sense to match that.
:
:We'll get increased attention by going to a 2.0 release, just by virtue of
:the number, and I'd like to take advantage of that by being able to talk
:up a new filesystem (and whatever other achievements we have at that
:point).
I'm not firm on calling it 2.0. I'm thinking we shouldn't call it 2.0.
I don't like going to two digits on 1.x either though, but we may have
to.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon at backplane.com>
More information about the Kernel
mailing list