dragonfly system backups
Simon 'corecode' Schubert
corecode at fs.ei.tum.de
Mon Apr 9 04:10:16 PDT 2007
Dmitri Nikulin wrote:
Is there a really good reason not to tar the backups? It seems
impossible to have 50 million tarballs/days of backups, so I infer
that you're just doing a straight copy. Or maybe now's the time to
homebrew a more intelligent backup system. Or just make the
journalling layer useful for backups.
matt hardlinks files which didn't change since the last N-level run. this way there is always a full directory structure available. it's fairly straight forward *and* intelligent, just our FS isn't too happy about that.
cheers
simon
--
Serve - BSD +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII Ribbon /"\
Work - Mac +++ space for low â¬â¬â¬ NOW!1 +++ Campaign \ /
Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \
Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \
Attachment:
signature.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pgp00003.pgp
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: "Description: OpenPGP digital signature"
URL: <http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/kernel/attachments/20070409/c87afe44/attachment-0020.obj>
More information about the Kernel
mailing list