ipfw deprecation

Thu Jun 29 08:15:51 PDT 2006

On 29.06.2006, at 16:57, Scott Ullrich wrote:
Guys, has everyone failed to see that someone has already submitted a 
PFIL-ized IPFW2?   I don't see why everyone is making such a huge fuss 
over this when someone is already taking the time to do the work.
We're just stating our basic view on it.  Besides, the submission 
doesn't pfil-ize it, it just removes ipfw in favour of ipfw2.

cheers
  simon
--
Serve - BSD     +++  RENT this banner advert  +++    ASCII Ribbon   /"\
Work - Mac      +++  space for low â‚¬â‚¬â‚¬ NOW!1  +++      Campaign     \ /
Party Enjoy Relax   |   http://dragonflybsd.org      Against  HTML   \
Dude 2c 2 the max   !   http://golden-apple.biz       Mail + News   / \
Attachment:
PGP.sig
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pgp00016.pgp
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: "Description: This is a digitally signed message part"
URL: <http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/kernel/attachments/20060629/235b69d2/attachment-0020.obj>