nnull
Matthew Dillon
dillon at apollo.backplane.com
Thu Jan 5 09:26:37 PST 2006
:Maybe a doubly linked list of/in the namecache entries. Locking would
:always lock either just the first entry in the list (I think that's
:sufficient) or at least always obey the same order to prevent deadlocks.
: This way renames to self (in another incarnation) can be detected as
:well (by running through the list).
:
:cheers
: simon
I don't think it's going to be that simple. We are going to need a
cache coherency mechanism for namespace operations between machines just like
we are going to need it for file read/write ops. And, just like as I
have described for file I/O, whatever mechanism we come up with will work
just as well for competing entities on the same host as they will for
competing entities on different hosts.
In anycase, as I have said, I do NOT think this is an issue that nullfs itself
has to deal with. It is definitely an issue that we want the namecache layer
to deal with, or more particularly that we want a generalized cache coherency
layer to deal with.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon at xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
More information about the Kernel
mailing list