What do people think about adaptive polling?
Matthew Dillon
dillon at apollo.backplane.com
Mon Dec 11 12:57:18 PST 2006
:
:Hi,
:
:At 05:48 11/12/2006, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:>[...]The idea is to be able to do an end-run around systems with broken
:> interrupt routing by instituting adaptive polling. Basically all
:> devices that can produce events are polled at some reasonable minimum
:> rate, say 50hz. When polled, the device returns an indication as to
:> whether it processed any new events or not. [etc]
:
:Your problem will be with devices (if any exist) that don't give sane
:status unless they think they have interrupted. If designers can get
:the interrupt path wrong, they can get that wrong too.
:
:--
:Bob Bishop +44 (0)118 940 1243
Fortunately only the ATA hardware suffers from this particular problem.
All other hardware I've ever come across has a reliable status register
of some sort.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon at backplane.com>
More information about the Kernel
mailing list