Bug Tracking System [Was: Re: final thoughts - bug tracking system]
coolvibe at hackerheaven.org
Tue Sep 20 16:10:57 PDT 2005
Carl Schmidt wrote:
[language evangelism and mostly offtopic banter snip]
Okay...guys (or maybe girls?)...who cares?
This is the *kernel* list. I don't know why the hell the bug tracking
post made its way here in the first place. This is a completely stupid
that you two ought to be having outside of the list. It's Matt's
can do it in whatever language he wants to do it in. You are all
you can come and go as you please. If you don't like the way things
then I'm sure you can find a project that fits your needs, or perhaps
own, just as Matt did.
I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm here for a reason, because
interests me. I repeat: *the project* interests me.
As sofar as Matt doing this in C, and as sofar this whole bugtracker
bikeshed goes, who cares?
None of the presented options (of which some are very good, I must admit
(language it's implemented in notwithstanding)) seem to be a perfect
fit. But we do need a bug tracker _now_. Matt chose to scratch that itch
and acted instead of cobbling about and nattering about which of the
umpteen solutions are out there. So what if he's the project leader and
head benevolent dictator for life and whatever title you can stick to
him. You can't change what he wants to do.
Heck, maybe what Matt comes up with might suck as well, we'll see. You
know what? He's almost done. Damage done. No turning back. I guess we're
getting a Backplane powered bugtracking system written in C that uses
HTML templates that may or may not be unicode safe or <insert whatever
complaint>. If it doesn't work for us, we can always fall back to many
alternatives (we discussed a lot of them).
Okay, it does seem a somewhat NIH-ish thing to do, and it's a typical
Matt-Dillon-type stunt to pull (not that that's a totally bad thing),
but for the desillusioned people: Hold on for a bit. This might just
work. I for one just hope it will be better than GNATS ;)
I wouldn't still be lurking and occasionaly delurking around if I didn't
think this project had promise. I still think it has.
Now stop this nonsense about something as trivial as an application that
is in foundation just a glorified checklist of bugs that we need to
solve. Can we get back to the kernel please?
More information about the Kernel