unionfs: anyone working on this?

Wed May 18 17:04:31 PDT 2005

On 10.05.2005, at 03:45, Matthew Dillon wrote:
    It needs a from-scratch rewrite but the rewrite would be
    considerably less complex then the original implementation because 
it
    would only have to implement the new N*() VOP's instead of the old 
one's
    and would be able to return the original vnode rather then 
maintain a
    fake vnode.
hmm... I still don't understand how we can override the vnops without 
faking vnodes?!

cheers
  simon
--
Serve - BSD     +++  RENT this banner advert  +++    ASCII Ribbon   /"\
Work - Mac      +++  space for low $$$ NOW!1  +++      Campaign     \ /
Party Enjoy Relax   |   http://dragonflybsd.org      Against  HTML   \
Dude 2c 2 the max   !   http://golden-apple.biz       Mail + News   / \
Attachment:
PGP.sig
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pgp00001.pgp
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: "Description: This is a digitally signed message part"
URL: <http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/kernel/attachments/20050518/001eab3e/attachment-0020.obj>