RFC: backporting GEOM to the 4.x branch

[Ed]

On Thursday 03 March 2005 00:05, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>    Personally speaking I have no problem making ultra encryption available
>    to the general public, but I do believe (personally speaking) that the
>    *default* should be something slightly less secure just so criminals
>    and terrorists (at least the stupid ones, which is most or they wouldn't
>    be criminals or terrorists), don't get an automatic boost from our work.


"Terrorists use Linux."