CALL TO COMMITTERS! HELPING WITH SPL REMOVAL!
Hiten Pandya
hmp at backplane.com
Thu Jun 2 13:56:59 PDT 2005
Matthew Dillon wrote:
:Let me find a different way for the first step. I want to measure (and feel)
:the system before the change all of the tree. I have an idea how I can
:detect the spl() abuse (which has to be fixed anyway) and how we can
:replace the rest of the spls with critical sections to investigate the
:effect. The second step becomes mostly mechanical and I want to write
:a script to handle that first. Give me a few days to get it sorted out,
:since I also have to learn for a written exam on Monday :)
:
:This is not so much about whether the change is good or bad, but about
:*rushing* it in without thinking about the results first. We are not
:Linux afterall.
:
:Joerg
No. This is not going to be delayed. I am doing this now. If you
want to add statistics to the interrupt vector code to track the number
of interrupts due to spl and/or critical sections that's just fine,
you can compare a before and after system. But we are moving forward
on this because it is something that has to be done no matter how you
twist it.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon at xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hmm. Another thing that can be done is to convert it to use critical
sections, while Joerg could do the statistics code, after which you
and Joerg can exchange patches...?
Hiten Pandya
More information about the Kernel
mailing list