phk malloc, was (Re: ptmalloc2)
Bill Hacker
wbh at conducive.org
Sun Feb 27 16:18:41 PST 2005
er.dragonflybsd.org> <20050227231003.GA17810 at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050227160451.083bf7e8.cpressey at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <20050227160451.083bf7e8.cpressey at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <42226362$0$718$415eb37d at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 218.253.82.16
X-Trace: 1109549922 crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org 718 218.253.82.16
Xref: crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org dragonfly.kernel:7862
Chris Pressey wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:10:03 -0500
> Dan Melomedman <dan at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>>All I'd like to see is a way to guarantee physical memory to special
>>processes with an environment variable.
>
>
> There are plenty of unused letters in MALLOC_OPTIONS :) Care to donate
> a patch?
>
> -Chris
The most effective ones probably being currency symbols - backed up with
the cash <g>
Wait - isn't that what them funny-shaped blue and orange pills are
s'posed to 'guarantee'?
'physical memory with an environment variable' is a nice way of puttin'
it. (Pun intended.)
(runs for the hills....)
Bill
More information about the Kernel
mailing list