first release date
Matthew Dillon
dillon at apollo.backplane.com
Fri May 28 19:36:11 PDT 2004
::Yes, late in the month. Would end-of-year may be feasible for
::VFS/packaging? That's a question for the folks working on it, which may be
::better asked on, say, July 1st.
:
: I've been thinking about packaging seriously for the last few days and
: the more I think about it, the more I think we should just port Debian's
: apt-get, enforce a multi-installed-version capability (e.g. for libraries),
: and then focus on bringing patches into that framework.
:
: We'll definitely not have a packaging system in the first release, but
: I think having something by the end of the year is doable (and a good
: goal).
Or, even better... use the VFS environment idea as a course-grained
feature used to promote isolation and separation, and then use apt-get
within the environment.
So the 'apache user' might only have 10 ports installed (and only access
to those 10) while a GUI user might have 50 ports installed (and only
access to those 50). Overlaps would be allowed... the environments would
be considered independant.
Such environments would also enforce basic isolation/separation/security
features such as "/usr is read-only except for /usr/local", and would
be stackable, but instead of trying to use them on a per-package basis
we would use them on a per-user basis (or something like that).
This gives us the best of both worlds in my view.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon at xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
More information about the Kernel
mailing list