softupdates as mount option?
Ivan Voras
ivoras at geri.cc.fer.hr
Wed May 26 15:58:15 PDT 2004
I asked around in freebsd-current list about making softupdates a mount
option, and it seems that it can't be done because of backward
compatibility and licencing issues (and/or because "Kirk said so").
Since it is implemented in NetBSD (and at a very early stage, someone
said 3 years ago), the patches (also posted to freebsd-current) are
smallish, and DFBSD is not burdened by backward compatibility issues,
maybe it's a good idea to implement it as such?
I'm not 'pressing the issue', and it is not a big deal, but would be
convenient to have it as a mount(8) option (like sync and async) instead
of something completely external to it.
(If anyone wishes to do it, I suggest reading the pro and con
disucussion(s) at freebsd-current before starting)
More information about the Kernel
mailing list