questions on thttpd-notimeout package
Ivan Voras
ivoras at geri.cc.fer.hr
Sat Jul 17 15:34:52 PDT 2004
rmkml wrote:
what performance compared apache ?
what tested/results performance with thttpd ??
PS: Maybe add web page for performance comparaison ?
No, no, you missed the point entirely. Thttpd isn't here because it's
fast or such - in DFly it's used because it's small. Last time I checked
the binary was about 65K (and you only need the binary executable to run
it; no config files or anything; it's an excellent little server).
See http://www.acme.com/software/thttpd/ for details (in short: for
dynamic pages it only has CGI support (no "php-modules", and running PHP
as CGI is slow), it's VERY fast for serving static content, and can't
utilize SMP (because it's single-threaded asynchrounous server[*])).
[*] Since DFlys' TCP stack is (somewhat?) threaded, would even such
applications benefit from MP?
More information about the Kernel
mailing list