FreeVxFS

Matthew Dillon dillon at apollo.backplane.com
Tue Jan 20 15:38:18 PST 2004


    It sounds like enough changes are going to have to be made to it that
    it makes sense to put it under src/sys/vfs, but it depends somewhat on
    whether the original authors are still doing major development on it
    or not.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon at xxxxxxxxxxxxx>


:On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:07:52 +0000, Hiten Pandya wrote:
:
:> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
:> 
:>> On Wednesday, 14 January 2004 at 18:14:41 +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai
:>> wrote:
:>> 
:>>>Is there any use in putting FreeVxFS in our base?
:>>>
:>>>http://www.linuxhq.com/kernel/file/fs/freevxfs/
:>>>
:>>>The old one at least is under a BSDL.
:>> 
:>> 
:>> Hmm.  Where's the old one?
:> 
:> 	All versions of FreeVxFS to this date have been distributed under the
:> 	2-clause BSD license.  It has a clause, that if the developer wishes,
:> 	he can also distributed it as GPL'ed code; i.e. it is a dual-license.
:> 
:> 	I do not think we will have problems with importing this into the base
:> 	system for DragonFly, we can keep it under the sys/contrib/ directory
:> 	or something.
:
:Why not keep it under src/sys/vfs/ directory, since it can be BSD license?
:
:Cheers,
:Mezz
:
:> 	Thanks and regards,
:> 
:> 		-- Hiten
:
:
:-- 
:bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.
:





More information about the Kernel mailing list