Dangerously dedicated?

[Brooks Davis]

On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 11:08:21PM +0000, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 11:09:21PM +0100, Emiel Kollof wrote:
> : Why was DD actually implemented anyway?
> 
> I just like it because there's no delay when booting, and for an old laptop,
> it won't need to worry about any other OS.

This doesn't require DD.  All it requires is that you install a
different boot loader (standard IIRC).  I do this on my machines because
I don't multiboot them.

-- Brooks

-- 
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529  9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
Attachment:
pgp00014.pgp
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pgp00014.pgp
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: "Description: PGP signature"
URL: <http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/kernel/attachments/20040219/f9f15785/attachment-0020.obj>