andy at splashground.de
Mon Aug 16 02:54:10 PDT 2004
dillon wrote @ Sun, 15 Aug 2004 12:29:47 -0700 (PDT):
> :> Well, I dunno. bzip2 is now fairly ubiquitous in the world of UNIX,
> :> and it does produce ~17% better compressed ISOs. While I don't think
> :> it is a good general choice due to its lack of flexibility in cpu
> :> consumption (1), it may be a good choice for ISO distribution. bzip2 -9
> :> produces a 70MB file while gzip -9 produces an 82MB file.
> :With 7z i get a 49 MB file instead of the 79 MB with gzip.
> :See archivers/p7zip and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7z
> I looked at it, but I don't think we are going to use it. It looks
> like a mess of different algorithms and I don't trust that the long
> term (30 year horizon) stability and compatibility will be there.
No, it's just a tool and archive format that can like most others use
more than one algorithm, the interesting being LZMA.
So 7z is like tar with some compression programm - using LZMA by default
instead of LZ77 (gzip), BWT + Huffman Coding (bzip2), LZW (compress),
Huffman coding (pack).
So not a mess but a rich menu (like we already have) with some new
and better choices (LZMA and PPMD) and a new carte format.
If someone really thinks about integrating it i would imagine him (her)
only to implement LZMA and add an option to tar/libarchive to use it.
But i really just meant to use it for the iso-images.
I'll try to make those available for future releases.
More information about the Kernel