Documentation generation
Hiten Pandya
hmp at backplane.com
Sun Oct 19 01:47:48 PDT 2003
David Cuthbert wrote:
Matthew Dillon wrote:
I don't think we want to integrate document generation into the
source
code. The problem is that you can't get too wordy without making the
source unreadable, and the result are usually definitions so
sparse as
to be useless for understanding any serious API.
Yeah, Doxygen (and JavaDoc) both result in code that's more sparse than
I care for, making it more difficult for maintainers. For users of the
code, though, the indices and cross-reference tables that result are
quite valuable.
I would rather prefer documenting the necessary/important
functions by hand in a DragonFly Kernel Handbook, which keeps
things clean, and also allows detailed explanations.
I have already tried doxygen'ing the DFly source code, and it
is not healthy site at all!
Regards,
--
Hiten Pandya
hmp at xxxxxxxxxxxxx
More information about the Kernel
mailing list