variant symlinks (was Re: Anybody working on removing sendmail from base?)
mupi at mknet.org
Sun Oct 5 23:50:40 PDT 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Saturday 04 October 2003 01:32 pm, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Now, reasonably and obviously, one would want to also upgrade all the
> dependant ports. Realistically however the process of upgrading
> dependant ports to use the new version of some dependancy can take weeks or
> months depending on the complexity of the ports involved.
> Consider, for example, what happens when one tries to upgrade libpng.
> Seems simple enough, right? But there are hundreds of ports which
> depend on libpng, including openoffice. Suddenly upgrading libpng is not
> so simple.
Another example which I just went through was upgrading kde. I wound up in
the process having to upgrade my entire Xfree86, and the project took rather
close to a week, becuase some of the files depended on older versions that
were no longer available, so I had to manually do some of the work.
> So we have a classic convenience/space tradeoff here, and I personally
> far prefer the convenience of being able to upgrade my system without
> breaking half my ports.
As long as it doesn't break something else, in the process, I would add.
Breaking something else in the process is most likely not worth any amount of
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Kernel