Am I way off base here?

[Skip Ford]

Matthew Dillon wrote:
>     Well, my behavior isn't much better when it gets into the flame domain :-)

I've noticed.

>     argument is with FreeBSD making that design choice but then not following
>     through with the necessary static binary support to really make it work
>     well, and then using that as an excuse to make root dynamic.  Sigh.

Well, if you deliver code that provides NSS support to static binaries
without a dynamic root in time for 5.2, they'll probably listen.

-- 
Skip