rg70 at sbcglobal.net
Wed Aug 6 12:45:50 PDT 2003
Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :-On [20030806 20:32], Matthew Dillon (dillon at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> :> I haven't had a chance to try to reproduce it myself but I
> :> suspect that the issues are real and need to be addressed.
> :Well, I think they're real too. ;)
> :But right now I am trying to figure out why man is suddenly barfing on
> :the permissions.
> :Rob still needs to revert the commit though, although 't might be ok to
> :leave it for now, otherwise man/catN/ will be riddled with temporary
> :Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(at)wxs.nl> / asmodai
> I think my last email to Rob was "This doesn't look right at all"
> or something like that :-). I think that patch needs to be reverted
It is not right that is a fact. However there is another issue there,
and I am not sure what it is. At this point in time thats the minimum
permissions to get it to work cleanly. Which is a sorry state. I am
looking into what the real issue is, and when I figure it out, I will
change them back.
More information about the Kernel