not bad article, in my opinion

Justin C. Sherrill justin at
Thu Nov 4 20:38:55 PST 2004

> "Sascha Wildner" <saw at xxxxxxxxx> schreef:
>> Matthew Dillon wrote:
>>>     Makes me a wiki believer, it's a better organized description than
>>>     any that I could put together on my own.
>> If you find any errors, feel free to edit. :)
> Really good article indeed.. any ideas who wrote this? Perhaps the link to
> wikipedia should be on the website (in the FAQ for example)...?

"Jeremy Almey" <jere_almey at xxxxxxxxxxx> talked to me about the original
Wikipedia version of this back in April; that's the first record I have of
it.  You can see the Wikipedia article history here:

This version appears to be a cheap moneymaker - it's a rip of
the Wikipedia content (check the bottom of the page) with ads
placed on it so that it generates revenue.  Probably not a huge amount of
money coming it, but it's not like the content cost anything.

If we link to/use/modify anything, it should be the Wikipedia page:

More information about the Docs mailing list