cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/config configvers.h main.c mkmakefile.c         mkoptions.c src/sys Makefile src/sys/amd64/amd64 genassym.c         src/sys/amd64/include acpica_machdep.h asm.h atomic.h bootinfo.h         console.h coredump.h cpu.h cpufunc.h elf.h endian.h exec.h float.h ...
    Matthew Dillon 
    dillon at apollo.backplane.com
       
    Sun Oct 22 20:09:22 PDT 2006
    
    
  
:Matthew Dillon wrote:
:>   sys/<ARCH>/conf/<KERNEL> -> sys/config/<KERNEL>
:
:Wouldn't sys/arch/<ARCH>/conf/<KERNEL> be better? Otherwise, why here?
:
:Cheers,
:-- 
:         Thomas E. Spanjaard
:         tgen at xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    I considered it, but it isn't very user friendly to have to
    have your config files spread out all over the place.   The most
    likely scenario for a DragonFly user is going to be a couple of
    configs for a virtual kernel architectures, a few for IA32 (UP and
    SMP), and ultimately a few for IA64.  I think it makes a lot more
    sense for those files to be in one place.  Also, having to specify
    the machine architecture in the config file AND put the config file
    in a special architecture-specific place is kinda redundant.
					-Matt
    
    
More information about the Commits
mailing list