cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_exec.c sysv_ipc.c src/sys/sys proc.h

Sat Oct 8 08:40:08 PDT 2005

Matthew Dillon wrote:
:  Log:
:  1:1 Userland threading stage 2.3/4:
:  
:  Use p_comm instead of p_thread->td_comm.

    Actually, I moved p_comm to td_comm on purpose, otherwise pure 
    kernel threads will not have a command that 'ps' can display, and
    processes would wind up having *two* comm[] arrays.

    I'd prefer we just have one comm[] array, which tends to 
    mean that it should be in the struct thread structure.
Uhm, so each thread will carry the same information but proc won't?

Alright, I can back it out, it just seemed a bit weird not to have the 
command in struct proc.

And worrying about these 17 bytes seemed not reasonable either.

cheers
  simon
--
Serve - BSD     +++  RENT this banner advert  +++    ASCII Ribbon   /"\
Work - Mac      +++  space for low $$$ NOW!1  +++      Campaign     \ /
Party Enjoy Relax   |   http://dragonflybsd.org      Against  HTML   \
Dude 2c 2 the max   !   http://golden-apple.biz       Mail + News   / \