On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 03:48:44PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 11:06:48PM +0900, YONETANI Tomokazu wrote: > > I still don't understand what was wrong with using printf("%.*s"). > %.*s expects an integer length, but sysctl can return a size_t, which is > longer on most (all) 64bit platforms? Ah I see, thanks.