cvs commit: src/lib/libc/sys select.2

Wed Aug 3 08:34:58 PDT 2005

On 03.08.2005, at 17:13, Matthew Dillon wrote:
    Even nanosleep and usleep are wrong, since nanosleep uses a struct 
timespec
    and select uses a struct timeval.

    Select's timeout is rounded up to the nearest clock tick, while 
(our)
    nanosleep's timeout tries to be a lot more precise.
What should we write?  It's just to note that select() does in fact 
block for the time specified, like sleep, usleep and nanosleep do (= 
interruptible sleep).

cheers
  simon
--
Serve - BSD     +++  RENT this banner advert  +++    ASCII Ribbon   /"\
Work - Mac      +++  space for low $$$ NOW!1  +++      Campaign     \ /
Party Enjoy Relax   |   http://dragonflybsd.org      Against  HTML   \
Dude 2c 2 the max   !   http://golden-apple.biz       Mail + News   / \
Attachment:
PGP.sig
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pgp00001.pgp
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: "Description: This is a digitally signed message part"
URL: <http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/commits/attachments/20050803/9b046c64/attachment-0022.obj>