[DragonFlyBSD - Bug #1921] (In Progress) we miss mlockall

[bugtracker-admin at leaf.dragonflybsd.org]

Issue #1921 has been updated by tuxillo.

Description updated
Category set to VM subsystem
Status changed from New to In Progress
Assignee changed from 0 to tuxillo
Priority changed from Low to Normal

We do have @mlockall(2)@ but only _MCL_FUTURE_ is currently supported. _MCL_CURRENT_ still needs work to be done.


----------------------------------------
Bug #1921: we miss mlockall
http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/1921#change-14288

* Author: alexh
* Status: In Progress
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: tuxillo
* Category: VM subsystem
* Target version: 6.4
----------------------------------------
We don't have the mlockall/munlockall syscalls as documented in [1]. We have at 
least one tool in base that would benefit from it: cryptsetup. Hopefully someone 
more familiar with the VM system can implement it without much effort as we 
already have mlock/munlock.

Cheers,
Alex Hornung

[1]: http://opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/mlockall.html



-- 
You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it.
To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/my/account