[DragonFlyBSD - Bug #2064] (Rejected) Result too large -> no header -> RO hammerfs works
Alex Hornung via Redmine
bugtracker-admin at leaf.dragonflybsd.org
Wed Feb 29 07:10:31 PST 2012
Issue #2064 has been updated by Alex Hornung.
Description updated
Status changed from New to Rejected
Assignee deleted (0)
----------------------------------------
Bug #2064: Result too large -> no header -> RO hammerfs works
http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/2064
Author: Diego Cad
Status: Rejected
Priority: Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Target version:
Hi dragons,
i've been around HAMMER for linux past days, after a couple of typos it
worked nice for Ubuntu running 2.6.37-39. even since the driver had no
updates since 2009 (?)
1. tut 2 DF running virtualized? i use hless vbox lately with success.
2. still on that 'no header' dmesg sysout on Linux for the relative to \
dragonfoo# mount_hammer: mount on /tmp/fs: Result too large ->
followup -> /4d5c172f$0$927$415eb37d at crater_reader.dragonflybsd.org
3. could more ram result into a larger REDO tables ending in succes?
it is likely that the 'Result too large' for RW mount comes from
available ram to allocate the REDO tables? then what does that 'no
header' means (dfbsd and linux) but RO data is untouched.
basically i have 3gig ram and 160g hdd. REDO switches almost
automatically since last time the box was processing several i mean
several simultaneous processes (like 40 concurrent RW + 4 makes) then
the REDO as for reordering the last data flushes becomes without enough
dynamic allocation? it's more likely that it does not relate to HDD
space as originally thought even if the drive is 25% free capacity under
that load circumstances.
thx
Diego
--
You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it.
To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/my/account
More information about the Bugs
mailing list