[issue1501] mount_cd9660 segfaults
Simon 'corecode' Schubert
corecode at fs.ei.tum.de
Sat Sep 12 09:53:17 PDT 2009
Alexander Polakov (via DragonFly issue tracker) wrote:
Alexander Polakov <polachok at gmail.com> added the comment:
mount_cd9660 segfaults if you don't specify -L.
Okay, I'll fix this.
We should try to stay close to FreeBSDs behavior.
Hey, why? It's confusing to have different options for the same thing. I mean -L
(mount_msdos) and -C (mount_cd9660). Can we have both in mount_cd9660 at least?
They also have different semantics in FreeBSD. I don't know what is
better, I just know that they set a precedent, and we should have a very
good reason to break with it.
<3 the future +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII Ribbon /"\
rock the past +++ space for low CHF NOW!1 +++ Campaign \ /
Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \
Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \
More information about the Bugs