[issue1313] Signal code in kernel needs major overhaul (signal queues, si_code, si_addr)

Simon 'corecode' Schubert corecode at fs.ei.tum.de
Fri Dec 18 06:52:07 PST 2009


Alex Hornung (via DragonFly issue tracker) wrote:
Alex Hornung <ahornung at gmail.com> added the comment:

About this: I really think we should implement si_code and si_addr asap, 
without any major overhaul or anything. Not having for example CLD_EXITED 
breaks pkgsrc build of boost-libs, which in turn breaks 40-something more 
packages. Both FreeBSD and NetBSD support this properly.

Any comments?
Agreed.






More information about the Bugs mailing list