[issue1313] Signal code in kernel needs major overhaul (signal queues, si_code, si_addr)
Simon 'corecode' Schubert
corecode at fs.ei.tum.de
Fri Dec 18 06:52:07 PST 2009
Alex Hornung (via DragonFly issue tracker) wrote:
Alex Hornung <ahornung at gmail.com> added the comment:
About this: I really think we should implement si_code and si_addr asap,
without any major overhaul or anything. Not having for example CLD_EXITED
breaks pkgsrc build of boost-libs, which in turn breaks 40-something more
packages. Both FreeBSD and NetBSD support this properly.
Any comments?
Agreed.
More information about the Bugs
mailing list