BTX Halted on X86_64 master

[Thomas E. Spanjaard]

Bill Hacker wrote:
> elekktretterr at exemail.com.au wrote:
>> Well this is rather embarassing. This aint a 64bit processor. I bought
>> this thing like half a year after I bought my AMD64 workstation and I had
>> assumed (Core Duo) would be 64 bit.
>>
>> Sorry.....
>>
> 
> Odd, that. Just which specific CPU do you have? Mobility-something,
> perchance?
> 
> Not only the Core-2, but the earlier Core-D had Intel's '64-bit
> extensions' (mostly) cross-licensed from AMD.
> 
> My Core-D happily ran FreeBSD ADM64 (6.2 beta onward).
> 
> Is DFLY that different?
> 
> Bill

None of the Core Duo chips support EM64T. Are you perhaps confusing the
Pentium D with the Core Duo? Also, all Core Duo chips were mobile ones,
save for the Xeon ULV ("Sossaman"), which was for dual-socket servers
(short-lived though, as a couple of months later Woodcrest and friends
(Core 2-based) were released).
-- 
	Thomas E. Spanjaard
	tgen at netphreax.net
	tgen at deepbone.net

Attachment:
signature.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pgp00000.pgp
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 486 bytes
Desc: "Description: OpenPGP digital signature"
URL: <http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/bugs/attachments/20091213/285c0c97/attachment-0022.obj>