Futher mail woes

joerg at britannica.bec.de joerg at britannica.bec.de
Sat Feb 18 11:44:02 PST 2006

On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 04:28:56AM +0900, YONETANI Tomokazu wrote:
> openpam_load_module() says "no pam_XXX.so found" when the module
> failed to load.  It failed loading because of a missing symbol
> login_getpwclass, which is defined in libutil, but qpopper isn't
> linked against it.  The following command installs qpopper linked
> against libutil, but it doesn't seem to be a correct solution though.

I hate programs doing nasty stuff in fork() without allowing non-daemon
operation. Yeah, I've been looking at it today as well -- pam_unix
wasn't linked with -lutil.

/me slaps himself for not seeing the obvious problem when pam_permit.so


More information about the Bugs mailing list