new expected behavior? src/bin/rm/rm.c

Matthew Dillon dillon at
Fri Jun 3 10:45:13 PDT 2005

:-On [20050603 18:52], Joerg Sonnenberger (joerg at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
:>I think it *must* override -I, otherwise it is not POSIX anymore.
:>-f is meant to be "do what I say and shut up".
:Aye, force it is. +1
:Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(at)> / asmodai / kita no mono

    Sniff.  I'm being overridden! :-)

    Maybe I'll introduce a -II option that overrides -f ?  So people who
    want -f to override everything can use -I, and people who don't can
    use -II :-).  I'm only half joking here.


More information about the Bugs mailing list