new expected behavior? src/bin/rm/rm.c

Thomas E. Spanjaard tgen at
Fri Jun 3 04:08:03 PDT 2005

Matthew Dillon wrote:
    I am kinda leaning towards detecting background operation and disabling
    -I in that case, plus also requiring two -f's to override a prior -I.
    What do people think?
I agree. Also, you shouldn't need two -f's to override -I if it's a 
background job (but I think you had that idea all along ;)).

		-- Thomas E. Spanjaard
		   tgen at xxxxxxxxxxxxx

More information about the Bugs mailing list