new expected behavior? src/bin/rm/rm.c
Thomas E. Spanjaard
tgen at netphreax.net
Fri Jun 3 04:08:03 PDT 2005
Matthew Dillon wrote:
I am kinda leaning towards detecting background operation and disabling
-I in that case, plus also requiring two -f's to override a prior -I.
What do people think?
I agree. Also, you shouldn't need two -f's to override -I if it's a
background job (but I think you had that idea all along ;)).
-- Thomas E. Spanjaard
tgen at xxxxxxxxxxxxx
More information about the Bugs