Matthew Dillon wrote:
Yes, I agree, but I don't want to just break ports that were working
before for no good reason. Since any new code should use the long-form
of the option instead of the short form, I think we can safely make
-b be compatible with the old patch's -b.
OK, see submit@ for a patch that does just that.
Regards,
Sascha
--
http://yoyodyne.ath.cx