<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Hi,<br>
<br>
</font>I'm definitely having fun learning Dragonfly BSD, but <font
face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">I just read the linux-magazine
interview with Matt Dillon from last May:<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.linux-magazine.com/Issues/2022/258">https://www.linux-magazine.com/Issues/2022/258</a><br>
<br>
where he said "</font>As projects go, I think all the BSDs are
aging out, including DragonFly, but can remain relevant in this
world of Linux as long as we are able to offer installation on
modern systems". <br>
<br>
I know that the BSD's are less popular than Linux, but I don't think
FreeBSD is gonna go belly up anytime soon, or OpenBSD, or NetBSD for
that matter. As for DragonFly, another article I just read, from
yesterday, said that an effort is underway to port Hammer2 to
NetBSD:<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.phoronix.com/news/NetBSD-HAMMER2-Port">https://www.phoronix.com/news/NetBSD-HAMMER2-Port</a><br>
<br>
I admit to being a little confused... so, before I jump down the
rabbit hole and go further trying to learn about DragonFly BSD and
how it does things, I've got a few questions for y'all and would
appreciate hearing your opinions:<br>
<br>
* Do you see dragonfly bsd as a going concern (or did I miss a
defunct notice somewhere)? <br>
* Do you see it continuing to be actively developed and maintained
in the mid (3-5 year) term future? <br>
* Do you see it continuing to be actively developed and maintained
in the long (5-10 year) term future? <br>
* Or what? <br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Will<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>