Hello,<br><br>I am running H1 on dm_crypt(4) since a few months, on 5.2 then 5.4 and for what it's worth, it's been really stable.<br><br>As Aaron said it's FS independent so it should work fine with H2.<br><br>Cheers,<br><br>Laurent<br><br>Sent from my Huawei Mobile<br><br>-------- Original Message --------<br>Subject: Re: HAMMER2 updates in master - will be brought into the current release for Christmas<br>From: Daniel Bilik <ddb@neosystem.org><br>To: users@dragonflybsd.org<br>CC: <br><br><br><br><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-15">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="Zarafa HTML builder 1.0">
<TITLE></TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT STYLE="font-family: courier" SIZE=2>
On Sun, 9 Dec 2018 11:01:48 -0800<br>
Matthew Dillon <dillon@backplane.com> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Now that we've rolled the release, the master branch has received a<br>
> significant HAMMER2 update.<br>
<br>
At the occasion of Matt's excellent progress in this area, let me be a<br>
little curious:<br>
<br>
Is anyone using H2 on dm_target_crypt(4) device? Is initrd(7) ready for<br>
this? Is it considered stable?<br>
<br>
Thanks.<br>
<br>
--<br>
Daniel<br>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY></HTML>