ipfw2 for dragonflybsd

bycn82 bycn82 at gmail.com
Tue Nov 18 17:26:22 PST 2014


*​why not share more information, for example write a internal document for
developers like NetBSD in order to help newcomers.*


*https://www.netbsd.org/docs/internals/en/index.html
<https://www.netbsd.org/docs/internals/en/index.html>*


On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Sepherosa Ziehau <sepherosa at gmail.com>
wrote:

> For static rules, ipfw2 in the base is already lockless MPSAFE.  I
> want to change the states lockless MPSAFE (it was not doable back to
> the time I made ipfw2 static rules lockless MPSAFE; but now since we
> dispatch udp outputs to the proper netisr, it is doable).
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Zachary Crownover
> <zachary.crownover at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I would say follow in the steps that were taken for the pf code that was
> > touched recently for SMP support and prevention of locking for you
> > application of the same into ipfw.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 10:04 PM, bycn82 <bycn82 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi ,
> >> I am re-writing the ipfw for dragonflybsd. and once I cleanup the code,
> I
> >> will continue port some useful features like NAT and policy routing.(
> NAT
> >> will be the next one)
> >>
> >> And here is a simple wiki page for it,
> >> http://www.dragonflybsd.org/docs/ipfw2/
> >>
> >> any comment? Sure I need people's help in testing of it. thanks in
> >> advanced.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> bycn82
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Zachary Crownover
>
>
>
> --
> Tomorrow Will Never Die
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141119/192faf50/attachment-0009.html>


More information about the Users mailing list