3.8 release plans

[Zachary Crownover]

Not that I'm defending an error, but why use UFS when you can use HAMMER?
I'm just curious.


On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:24 AM, karu.pruun <karu.pruun at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Zenny wrote:
> > Confirmation that iso works fine in VirtualBox 4.3.8 OSE with ACPI
> > disabled. But the img file didn't.
> >
> > On 5/28/14, Justin Sherrill <justin at shiningsilence.com> wrote:
> >> "Hey this boots strangely oh wait it is just this particular version of
> >> VirtualBox that has the problem" has been a reported problem at what
> feels
> >> like every release for years.  I'm starting to think that if anyone
> reports
> >> issues in VirtualBox, the first step should always be "try a different
> >> version of VirtualBox, or a different virtual system".
>
>
> Point taken, suppose it's a good idea to test on different machines.
>
> However, now it looks again like a DFly problem. I tested on
> Virtualbox 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 and finally reproduced it on a physical
> machine too. It only concerns installations where all partitions are
> UFS. It does not show for a hammer system (ie root HAMMER and /boot
> UFS).
>
> I used the partition layout:
>
> ---
> /  UFS
> swap
> /usr  UFS
> ---
>
> when booting the system from hdd, the acpi/ehci error shows for DFly
> 3.6.x and 3.8.0RC where both are x86_64. So it appeared already in
> 3.6.x.
>
> Peeter
>
> --
>



-- 
Sincerely,

Zachary Crownover
mobile (310) 487-5573
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140529/a1598ef5/attachment-0010.html>