DragonFly support in Go

[John Marino]

On 1/17/2014 20:04, Justin Sherrill wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz at golang.org
> <mailto:bradfitz at golang.org>> wrote:
> 
> 
>     But the Go 1.2 you have already in ports might be sufficient to
>     build the builder worker and start the process.  Even the plan9 and
>     solaris ports started with months of red failure on our dashboard.
> 
> 
> The best long-term solution is to have a DragonFly system doing
> bleeding-edge Go builds in a loop, correct?  Even if it builds in
> (d)ports, that won't catch possible problems until the port itself is
> updated, and I'm assuming the purpose of this is to serve as a sort of
> tinderbox/warning system.
> 
> If I can scare up a separate machine to do it, I'd be happy to build it.
>  I've been meaning to do something with Go, but like any project,
> without a clear work target it's been hard to get started.

Justin,
Rather than look for a separate machine, I suggest we add these to
pkgbox64 and pkgbox32 official servers.  Then you can tend them there.

I doubt it's a loop though, it is probably triggered.  Maybe even as
often as every new commit.

John