ipfw2 for dragonflybsd

[bycn82]

*"lockless state" was there, but any recommendation about the testing in
order to know the performance different?*

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Sepherosa Ziehau <sepherosa at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 3:39 PM, bycn82 <bycn82 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > It will be good to have a try on this "lock-less NAT" in order to know
> the
> > performance. but IMHO, I think the performance will not be good
> especially
> > when the machines has lots of CPU.
>
>
> Number of CPUs does not matter that much, since its bwteen at most two
> CPUs (two netisrs).\
>
> Best Regards,
> sephe
>
>
> >
> > Anyway , next will be "lockless" for "keep-state". maybe this weekend :)
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Sepherosa Ziehau <sepherosa at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Matthew Dillon
> >> <dillon at apollo.backplane.com> wrote:
> >> >     On how to make NAT work, what I did in PF was this:
> >> >
> >> >     (a) When the port is not locked to a particular number, I simply
> >> > iterate
> >> >         ports until the toepliz hash for the translated address/port
> >> > pair
> >> >         winds up on the same cpu as the toeplez hash of the original.
> >> >
> >> >         This way both sides of the NAT conversation wind up on the
> same
> >> > cpu
> >> >         and no locking is required.
> >> >
> >> >     (b) If the translated port is locked (which is a feature that PF
> >> > has,
> >> >         for example), it may not be possible to match up the toeplez
> >> > hash.
> >> >
> >> >         In this situation the state goes into a global table with a
> >> > global
> >> >         lock, and the state is individually locked by the filter.
> >> >
> >>
> >> In addition to what Matt has mentioned, I think lockless NAT could be
> >> implemented in the following way:
> >>
> >> - On output path install state for the current netisr.  And rehash the
> >> packet then send to the target netisr, and install 'sibling state' in
> >> the target netisr; do the real output there.
> >> - Same applies to the input path; but do the protocol input in the
> >> target netisr.
> >>
> >> However, the result may not be better than or as good as
> >> per-cpu+global lock Matt implemented for the PF, since my way requires
> >> additional dispatch.
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> sephe
> >>
> >> --
> >> Tomorrow Will Never Die
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Tomorrow Will Never Die
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141207/9687172b/attachment-0007.html>