STLport?

[Yury Tarasievich]

Okay, that's your blessed right.

So, how about some ideas on what to use instead?

---

On 01/08/06, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 03:29:55PM +0300, Yury Tarasievich wrote:
> The next major show-stopper is the absence (as perceived by the g++
> and by the naked eye) of the struct __FILE and of the appropriate
> member fields stlport expects.
Which is the ultimate reason why I refuse to touch it. No program has
the right to assume anything about the size of FILE, period.
Joerg