Standards Conformance
Joerg Sonnenberger
joerg at britannica.bec.de
Sat Nov 13 06:03:09 PST 2004
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 02:18:22AM -0600, Jason Smethers wrote:
> This brings up the question. What do we want to do in reguards to
> conformance to multiple specifications? Should all of them be listed, or
> should a "best one" be picked?
I'd like indication of the minimal standard, according to the following
hierachie:
1. ISO C89
2. POSIX
3. SUS
ISO C99 feature should be marked explicitly as such, as well as extensions
from *BSD or glibc.
Joerg
>
> - Jason
More information about the Users
mailing list