dragonfly system backups

Simon 'corecode' Schubert corecode at fs.ei.tum.de
Mon Apr 9 04:10:16 PDT 2007


Dmitri Nikulin wrote:
Is there a really good reason not to tar the backups? It seems
impossible to have 50 million tarballs/days of backups, so I infer
that you're just doing a straight copy. Or maybe now's the time to
homebrew a more intelligent backup system. Or just make the
journalling layer useful for backups.
matt hardlinks files which didn't change since the last N-level run.  this way there is always a full directory structure available.  it's fairly straight forward *and* intelligent, just our FS isn't too happy about that.

cheers
 simon
--
Serve - BSD     +++  RENT this banner advert  +++    ASCII Ribbon   /"\
Work - Mac      +++  space for low €€€ NOW!1  +++      Campaign     \ /
Party Enjoy Relax   |   http://dragonflybsd.org      Against  HTML   \
Dude 2c 2 the max   !   http://golden-apple.biz       Mail + News   / \
Attachment:
signature.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pgp00003.pgp
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: "Description: OpenPGP digital signature"
URL: <http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/kernel/attachments/20070409/c87afe44/attachment-0020.obj>


More information about the Kernel mailing list