SVN vs. GIT

[Matthew Dillon]

:Stöckert András wrote:
:> As I looked at them, it seems that GIT is the popular new kid on the
:> block, but it has some interesting features, so it isn't only the hype. We
:> should make a test GIT repo, and see how it works. I give my vote to GIT.
:
:Yep, I also think that GIT is worth a try, but you may also try
:git-svn (Accessing Subversion repositories using GIT).
:
:Regards,
:Sylwester

    This poor hammer@ list.  Most of the discussion is still occuring
    on our kernel list but hammer@ will eventually pick up some steam.

    GIT is my preference.  The DragonFly project moved over to GIT last
    year so it would be a whole lot easier to maintain a peer repo with
    just GIT in it and still be able to stay in sync with the HAMMER
    portion of the DragonFly repo.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon at backplane.com>